How do peer court programs function in juvenile justice?

Peer court programs function by involving peers in the decision-making processes related to juvenile justice cases. In these programs, a group of youth, often trained for the role, hears cases involving their peers who have committed minor offenses. The primary philosophy behind peer courts is to empower young people, providing them with a sense of responsibility and the opportunity to engage in the justice system in a constructive way.

During these proceedings, the youth jurors discuss the case, consider the circumstances surrounding the incident, and ultimately decide on an appropriate response or consequence. This peer involvement helps to create a more relatable and supportive environment, which can encourage personal remorse and accountability in the juvenile being judged. It also allows for restorative justice practices, focusing on understanding the impact of the behavior on the victim and the community, rather than solely on punishment.

The other choices do not accurately represent the function of peer court programs. For instance, peer courts do require some level of adult involvement, especially in oversight and training. They do not predominantly focus on punitive measures; rather, the goal is rehabilitation and community reintegration. Additionally, peer courts do not prevent juvenile engagement but rather promote constructive engagement in the justice process.